Pope was Jewish says historian

by Riazat Butt
Published 14 April 2005

A Manchester historian has claimed that Pope John Paul II was Jewish.

Yaakov Wise says his study into the maternal ancestry of Karol Josez Wojtyla (John Paul II’s real name) has revealed startling conclusions. Mr Wise, a researcher in orthodox Jewish history and philosophy, said the late Pope’s mother, grandmother and great-grandmother were all probably Jewish and came from a small town not far from Krakow. The Pope was a priest and cardinal archbishop in the Polish city before his election to the papacy.

Mr Wise said: “According to orthodox Judaism, a person’s Jewish identity is passed down through the maternal line. I saw a photograph of the Pope’s mother and I showed it to people who didn’t know who she was. They all said she looked Jewish. So I started doing more investigations about her background.”

Although he believes the Pope’s father was an ethnic Pole, he thinks that John Paul’s mother Emilia Kaczorowski - Emily Katz in English - was Jewish and that she was the daughter of Feliks Kaczowski, a businessman from Biala-Bielsko in Poland. Katz is a common surname amongst East European Jewish families.

Emilia’s mother, the Pope’s grandmother, was Maria Anna Scholz. Scholz, or Schulze, is also a common surname among Jews, as is Rybicka, or Ryback, which is the surname of the Pope’s great-grandmother Zuzanna.

All the names or their variations appear on gravestones in the old Biala Jewish cemetery, as does the surname of Felik’s mother Urszula Maklinowska. Mr Wise said: “The Pope’s ancestry has been researched by an American historian. But nobody has traced the family name through the Jewish community and, as Jewish historian, I have access to information that a non-Jewish historian wouldn’t know about. I’m not making any firm conclusions, but what I’m saying is that there is a lot of circumstantial evidence to say that he was Jewish.

“The Pope’s mother married out of the Jewish community to wed a Catholic. Her children were born and raised as Catholics and the Pope was baptised. It would shed light on why the Pope had to go into hiding from the Nazis in November 1940. If he had been a pure ethnic Pole this would not have been necessary.

“It would also explain why this Pope in particular felt a strong desire to improve relations between the Church of Rome and the Jewish people.”

So Wojtyla did have solid ground to fear he was a Jew, to fear he had inherited cursed blood, the hidden essential attribute of Jewishness. Supposed descent from the ‘Christ killers’ inflicts guilt which the individual either rejects as nonsense in the anxious process of assimilation, or else deflects in that despair which sustains Judaism. Thus Jewish communities produce no organised resistance to Judaism’s globalist anti-humanity because unmentionable guilt cowers the human mind into either moral avoidance that takes refuge in any diversion, or into adopting anti-morality, the cosmetic morality of the Hate establishment, as good. In 1978 Pope John Paul II assumed custody of a structure in the final stages of destruction by the subversives with whom he had energetically worked during the Second Vatican Council. However, as Pope, was he too cowered to resist the destroyers, or did he ardently remain one of them? Whether or not the Iron Curtain hatists, who allowed him out to attend the Council, knew or mused that he was a Jew, or did not care, they certainly knew from long observation that their evil empire, then inflicting mass murder on the Church, had his intellectual sympathy. They knew the avant-garde actor was not a Catholic; but was he an anti-Catholic committed to Judaism as dedicated anti-Catholicism?

Was Wojtyla’s real father Cracow’s Prince Archbishop Adam Stefan Sapieha, as this bronze memorialising him in stark horror would suggest? Was Sapieha an illegitimate child of Adam Stanislaw Sapieha and his sister-in-law Helena Sanguszko? Wojtyla’s mother, Emilia Kaczorowska, died 13 April 1929. On 12 December 1934 her coffin was transported from Wadowice, officially to Kraków’s Rakowicki cemetery. Or was it really re-interred in St. Leonard’s crypt, Wawel Cathedral, where Wojtyla said his first Mass, in All Souls black vestments, attended by all members of his ‘Rhapsodic Theatre?’ In early 1939, did Pope Pius XI require Sapieha’s dismissal, but then died? Benedict XVI really should enquire.

Trained in secret then ordained alone—on All Saints 1946 by Archbishop Sapieha, never persecuted by Nazi then Red God-haters—was Wojtyla the ‘the man of sin,’ ‘revealed’ after the obstacle to antichrist, the Eucharist, was finally removed in 1969? If, as reported, he felt hurt that nobody read the mountains of unreadable ambiguity he wrote, the blindness of innocent benignity would be suggested. In any event, his energetic repetition of condemned heresy implying that all religions are equal (thus equally vacant), and his persistent tolerance of homicide plus criminal, financial, liturgical, theological and sexual scandal did describe publicly his monstrous pontificate; but so also did his remarkable, puzzling then excruciating determination unto death.

To the World Hate Establishment he was ace of trumps, and his globally attended and televised funeral triumphally celebrated their Judas Pope’s eternal damnation; but to disinherited youth he was heroic, refusing absolutely to surrender—something or other—more likely to fear as he publicly repeated, and most likely to fear of hell. Was that guilt which threatens total annihilation the terrible goad of Wojtyla’s energy? Did hate supply all he hoped for? Was his perseverance frantic? God knows. We can know only that he was the corrosive whom degraded Christendom deserved. He eradicated what Pope Paul VI levelled, and Catholics cared not a hoot.

Return to “Their Tribulation”